We’re only talking about a 5% increase in 1% low performance though.Intel’s higher clocked CPUs do perform well in Photoshop and while the 10700K doesn’t destroy the 3900X, at least it’s able to match it here, and that’s not something we’ve seen much of.If you play at 1440p, and I like to think this is the minimum resolution people rocking an RTX 2080 Ti would target, then the difference between the 10700K and the 3900X, for example, is basically indistinguishable.Looking at the average performance across the 7 games tested at 1080p, we see that the 10700K is basically identical to the 10900K and just a whisker faster than the 9900K. If an OEM puts a 65w cooler on a 95w part and some buyer says "I'm not hitting 3.9 GHz," then AMD can go "well, the OEM isn’t meeting the base spec for the cooler. In terms of L3 cache (16 MiB) and iGPU (UHD Graphics 630), a Core i7-10700K is then identical to the Core i9-9900K – but about 100 Dollar less expensive.Of course faster modules are also possible. This update sees Ryzen processors perform significantly better and now the 3900X is able to roughly match the 9900K in our IPC test.The dual chiplet 3900X was again a bit faster than the single chiplet 3700X, offering a 4% bump for the average frame rate.
This meant when matched at the same clock speed, the 3900X was 6% faster than Intel’s i9-9900K and 13% faster than the 2700X.Another game we decided to check out was World of Tanks. 7nm Zen2 processors have arrived.
That’s an incredible performance uplift and it goes a long way in explaining why we saw 100% performance gains in applications such as WinRAR.Something we discovered when first testing the Ryzen 7 3700X was the much lower-than-expected write memory bandwidth. L3 cache goes unchanged with both models sporting a 16 MB capacity.Code compilation performance sees the 10700K just edge ahead of the 9900K, making it slightly slower than the 3700X and a whopping 33% slower than the 3900X. When compared to 2nd-gen Ryzen, the newer architecture is a massive improvement. Intel Core i9-10900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results For the very fair priced Ryzen 9 3900X, just over 400 Dollar are due and that is a snap in view of the prices Intel is calling for for the Core i9 9900K.Test reports on the actual successor of the i9 9900K, which is now called i7 10700K, are therefore hardly to be found.This applies not only to the Ryzen 7 3700X, but to all Ryzen 3000 CPUs presented.We’ll do the test for you using the two models Intel Core i7-10700K and Core i9-10900K.While the LGA 1151 supports a maximum of processors with a TDP of 95 watts, the LGA 1200 can also supply the latest Comet-Lake CPUs with up to 125 watts TDP with sufficient power.The register file can now be fed with 180 entries, giving the Ryzen 3000 CPUs more access to data to be processed.A direct connection of the graphics card and fast PCIe SSDs via the processor should therefore be prioritized.If you calculate this performance down to 1 GHz, you get a nice measurement value for the absolute single core performance of a CPU, which can be compared well between the generations.In addition, the i9 now also has two additional cores, which also provide more performance for multi-threaded tasks.The Core i7-10700K is clearly the better Core i9-9900K and we liked it quite a bit, but compared to the AMD Ryzen 3700X & Ryzen 9 3900X, which plays in about the same performance class, the price is unfortunately too high (290 to 450 Dollar), not to mention that AMD even includes a usable cooler!For our test, we can use two models of the new Ryzen 3, the Ryzen 7 3700X and the Ryzen 9 3900X.However, these are still based on the Zen+ architecture and are therefore rather renamed models of the previous APUs and do not really appear in the new Zen 2 launch.First overclocking models could also be operated with up to 5,100 MHz on the platform.Our 4500 MHz modules could be started directly at 3800 MHz without any problems and without any special settings.In our first review of the new Intel processors, we take a closer look at the Core i7-10700K and the Core i9-10900K as the respective overclocking models of their series.The Core i9-10900K is also listed as a configurable 95 watt TDP processor with a 3.3 GHz clock.Our test samples come from the trade and were bought by us.The pure performance per clock has not changed for generations at Intel.On the positive side, the Z490 chipset as well as the Z390 is very stable and, unlike the X570 from AMD, does not require any special cooling.The absolute high-end model of the series in the form of the Core i9-10900K can offer two cores more in comparison to the Core i9-9900K and comes up with a total of 10 cores, which can process up to 20 threads simultaneously via HT.Depending on the area of application, performance increases by up to 69 percent.