Threadripper was never meant to be a server part. The EPYC 7742 allegedly built the Linux kernel up to 53.86% faster than a Xeon Platinum 8280 and up to 5.64% faster than dual Xeon Platinum 8280s. The huge CPU caches make up for a lot. But for my group, it has become moot. At CES, AMD showed its new 64-core Threadripper beating the dual Xeon Platinum setup in a 3D rendering application called VRAY, and today additional benchmark numbers have surfaced in SiSoft SANDRA, showing Threadripper 3990X out-scoring the Intel setup by around 18 percent. I had machines with more memory than a 1TB 10 years ago. Out newest servers are AMD.They definitely were in the the past. Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Hardware Unboxed compared Ryzen 1000 & Kaby Lake in modern gaming in some recent videos if you want to … It has 28 physical cores and 56 threads to throw at workloads, and is clocked at 2.5GHz to 3.8GHz. The way AMD gets to 32 and 64 cores is by packing quad-core processors on die with an interconnect between them. But the biggest DIMMs I personally own are 32GB each so I can't test higher capacities.AM4 and TR Motherboard vendors do not generally validate for high-capacity memory, which is why they list lower capacities, but I they all support high-capacity memory just fine.Very few people need that much memory even on a threadripper.
If you, how much is your time worth?The problem with the Threadripper platform is indeed that there is insufficient bandwidth to the RAM but also between cores. Not really the best fit for a threadripper, honestly. Du siehst, AMD hat die deutlich bessere Effizienz! Not only do you get 128 PCIe lanes (actually more when you include the chipset), but the Zen 2 I/O hub built into the cpu chip has over 400 GBytes/sec of peer-to-peer bandwidth.
Anyway, VMware isn't the company it once was technically. Or is it Intel?Intel knows that enterprise customers are quite conservative and won't rush to go AMD, they very much know how to run a business and extract maximum profit. You're comparing totally disparate processors in an attempt to defend Intel's lineup.If you want to compare equivalent chips, the Epyc 7742 can address 4TB of RAM compared to 4.5TB for the Xeon Platinum 9282... and the 7742 has nearly twice the cache negating any advantage to be had from that extra 12.5% RAM compared to the Intel chip.The fact is, AMD's chips are superior to Intel's offerings in nearly every way at this point... and they'll likely continue to be for the foreseeable future. If we put the 3990X against the EPYC 7702P, the 64-core single socket offering on the enterprise side, then the 3990X has a higher thermal window (280W vs 200W) to enable higher frequencies (2.9/4.3 vs 2.0/3.35) and is cheaper ($3990 vs $4425), but it only has half the memory channels (only 4 compared to 8), half the PCIe lanes (only 64 compared to 128), and no registered memory support. I'm trying to convince myself that I won't need a 64-core processor this year.This TR generation is much less numa than the previous due to the symmetric memory controller/IO hub. For a gaming workstation, AMD has always been the best bang for the buck, but not for workstations that actually run graphics or large models or things that need massive amounts of context switches (eg. Again you can easily buy 4 of the Xeon for 1 of your Ryzen.Yeah yeah, you're a paragon of virtue, we all know it. I can run the memory at up to around 2666.Insofar as I know, one can use 64GB DIMMs in both situations (256GB on AM4 and 512GB on TR), and I think 128GB DIMMs can be used on the TR. This severely limits the bandwidth for both I/O and memory, hence why you need Quad-Channel DDR4 memory to get the best performance out of them.So it really depends on your workload whether or not you'll see improvements. : pri 56C112T Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 padaju uz aj namietky diagnostikovanych intel-blaznov, ze ved Intel ma svoje serverovske CPU aj pre 4- a 8-socketove systemy a AMD iba pre 1- a 2-socketove ... no to sa Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 netyka, ten je max. However, Eypc is the real competition in that space.Not always the dual Xeon can handle a lot more ram so if you are using it for VMs it can be an advantage. You can buy them on Amazon.64GB and 128GB EUDIMMs are only available in commercial channels insofar as I can tell. The way AMD gets to 32 and 64 cores is by packing quad-core processors on die with an interconnect between them. The chip also includes support for dual-socket systems, providing 112 cores and 224 threads per motherboard, runs at a 2.6GHz base and 3.8GHz Turbo Boost frequency, includes a whopping 77MB of L2 cache memory, and four Intel Ultra Path Interconnect (UPI) links, alongside support for Intel's Virtualisation Technology (VT-x), Transactional Synchronisation Extensions New Instructions (TSX-NI), two AVX-512 fused multiply-add (FMA) units, and Intel's Run Sure reliability, availability, and serviceability functionality.All that performance comes at a cost, of course, and while Intel has yet to share pricing on the chip, which is likely to be at 'if you have to ask you can't afford it' levels, it has stated that the 14nm part has a hefty thermal design profile (TDP) of 400W.