):Before jumping into the performance results, I’d encourage you to look over our system specs and basic testing methodologies:I unfortunately do not have a Quadro P600 to test AMD’s latest cards against, but there is a huge amount of performance information nonetheless that should prove useful in helping you figure out which one of the lower-end options are best for you. Solid performance through our real-world benchmark suite and closer proximity to Ellesmere's sweet spot make WX 7100 a more efficient product.Adding current measurements to our test suite allows us to confidently assert that the Radeon Pro WX 7100 remains within AMD's specifications, even when it's pushed hard.
This helps identify short power spikes (and troughs) without bombarding you with all of the raw data.If you want to know more about how we test and the equipment we use, check out The Math Behind GPU Power Consumption And PSUs.The 137-watt limit we mentioned earlier is slightly higher than the 130W typical board power cited on AMD's webpage. Vega Frontier has 13.1 TFlops in FP32 and the 3 WX 5100 have 11.7 TFlops in FP32. I followed the usual installation technique -- uninstalled the HD 7750 drivers first, rebooted, then installed the Dec 2017 release (most recent release) of the Radeon Pro drivers. Both are low-profile cards, enabling you to get serious work done on very small PCs.As odd as it may seem, I think the design of the WX 3100 and WX 2100 is a big improvement over the WX 4100 in that a full-sized DisplayPort connector is guaranteed to be available. The main difference is that the lower card has just 2GB of VRAM, whereas the WX 3100 has a much beefier 4GB. Demanding workloads appear to be pegged at 137 watts without any room to push higher, which is good.In addition to the high-resolution measurement curves we normally present, we're adding a second, more reader-friendly look at the same data using significantly longer intervals supplemented by a hardware-based low-pass filter and a variable filter in the evaluation software. For this reason, we're only using the lower-resolution charts with a variable low-pass filter applied for our analysis.At the start of this review we noted the Radeon Pro's restrictive power limit that tried to keep the card below its 130W ceiling. Previously I had a Radeon HD 7750 successfully working with both monitors at 4K before installing the WX5100. But Vega Frontier consumes 300 Watts and 3 WX 5100 consumes 225 Watts, with 24 GB memory against 16GB from Vega Frontier. You will receive a verification email shortly.©Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor,New York,NY 10036.Compared to previous features, our evaluation hardware hasn't changed:The FirePro brand is dead; long live the Radeon Pro. I was very conflicted and figured I …
In fact, we detected wild swings in frequency, with the old driver spending most of its time at 1750 MHz and only sporadically throttling down. On page 2, AMD’s ProRender plugin is used in Autodesk’s 3ds Max 2017 to render two scenes, while two de facto benchmarking tools wrap it up: Cinebench and LuxMark.