AMD’s automated overclocking can take it up to 4.3GHz in some cases, though it’s very much dependent on your motherboard, BIOS revision, and cooling.By the numbers, Intel’s 9900K is the more efficient chip, with a rated TDP of 95 watts, while the 3900X has a TDP of 105 watts. 64 x 2.9GHz vs 8 x 3.6GHz Now we can report that after tests, we’re even happier.Copyright ©2020 Designtechnica Corporation. Of course, if speed on that same task would be offset by having more cores and threads in the first place, that slight advantage in clock rates might matter less.
You will receive a verification email shortly.Speaking of memory, Zen 2 processors officially support dual-channel DDR4-3200, and the Ryzen 9 3950X is no exception.Our results from the POV-RAY multi-core test are just as damning for Intel. Zen 2 also supports the PCIe 4.0 specification, which doubles the available bandwidth for PCIe devices such as NVMe drives and graphics cards.AMD’s Ryzen has always been an amazing foundation for productivity machines, but they’ve never been as competitive in gaming performance as they are now.
Not only will you save a couple of hundred dollars; but you will also get better performance in most gameplay situations. The features that the Ryzen 9 3950X brings to the table really haven’t been seen at this price point before. The dual-socket EPYC server takes a monstrous win, but the 3990X also dishes out impressive performance that easily beats the dual-Xeon server. Meanwhile, on one classic, less-demanding esports favorite, Counter Strike: Global Offensive, the Ryzen 9 3900X outperformed its main Intel competitor.You may need to factor in the price of a new motherboard and cooler to support these chips, however.
The only drawback here is that AMD’s chip doesn’t include integrated graphics, which may be a huge deciding factor when building a PC.The 3900X can boost to 4.6GHz on a single core, but will be closer to 4.1GHz if using all cores and threads at the same time. Intel's strengths remain in its speed in lightly-threaded workloads where its high core frequencies provide a tangible benefit, but there is a limit to its scalability in heavily-threaded applications. AMD’s Ryzen 9 3950X has a clear performance advantage over Intel’s Core i9-9900K in many use cases, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a better value for all users. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K: Which High-End CPU to Buy?
O processador para desktop de alta tecnologia concorrente da Intel, o Core i9-10980XE, pode oferecer até 52GB/s de largura de banda. The 3990X posts surprisingly good performance after we engage the auto-overclocking feature, but the overclocked Core i9-10980XE and W-3175X take the lead by virtue of their drastically higher clock speeds. All right, all right, we get it: The Threadripper 3990X is in no way intended for gaming. As we said at the top, the Threadripper 3990X isn't for gaming. With their $500 list prices, both of these CPUs are expensive in absolute terms.
Again, if your software of choice is optimized to parcel out tasks to as many processing threads as it can, more is better here.The Ryzen 9 3900X has 12 cores to the Core i9-9900K's eight, so it gains the upper hand right from the beginning, at least as far as raw specs are concerned. Both the Ryzen and Intel chips, paired with a high-end video card, are capable, depending on the game, of driving frame rates in excess of the 120Hz, 144Hz, or 240Hz that even the highest-end gaming monitors can display.While a comparison of specs suggests that the Ryzen 9 3900X comes out on top in a bunch of seminal areas, real-world performance doesn't always reflect this.Here's a peek at the results we saw with the Ryzen 9 3900X versus the Core i9-9900K (as well as two other chips in their class) with a host of games on the RTX 2080 Ti and a synthetic benchmark...One of the concerns with earlier generations of AMD Ryzen CPUs is that with certain combinations of monitor resolution and video card (notably, with high-end video cards at lower resolutions, like 1080p), the Ryzens dealt lower frame rates versus using the same cards and settings with parallel Intel Core CPUs.