I have a Dell U4919DW monitor and a GTX 1070 GPU. Even the 2700X will max out an RTX 2080 Ti prior to any modifications of the game files.The margins close up a little at 1440p as the game starts to become more GPU bound, but still the 2700X and 3700X delivered comparable 1% low performance with averages well over 400 fps.World of Tanks is a slow-paced tank shooter where positioning is more important than flick shots, so 144 Hz displays that are fed 144 fps will be more than sufficient for this one. The 10600K was still up to 19% faster.Again, for max performance in a title such as PUBG, the Intel processor is clearly the superior option, though most may not require north of 150 fps in this title.Moving on to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, we’re only looking at very mild performance gains when moving from the 2700X to the 3700X to the tune of 8% better average frame rates, while the 10600K was 5% faster than the 3700X.With the RTX 2060 Super we saw basically the same performance from the three processors.The 1440p data sees virtually the same margins, we’re looking at up to a 6% improvement for the 3700X over the 2700X with the RTX 2080 Ti and RTX 2060 Super.When testing with Rocket League both Ryzen processors provided similar 1% low performance despite the 3700X boosting the average frame rate by 17%.We should note that by default Rocket League caps the frame rate to 250 fps, though it can be removed by editing a configuration file. I was surprised you were able to get 3600mhz out of the 2700x, my 2700 gets 3466mhz out of the B450 MSI board but nothing close to 3600mhz with Samsung B Die modules. Also the 3700x is currently on sale for $400. That's a massive generational performance leap.The margins remain about the same at 1440p. We’re still primarily CPU limited but 2700X still allowed for over 170 fps at all times.The War Thunder gives us another example of the significant step forward AMD made with Zen 2. These upgrades gave the Ryzen 7 3700X a more substantial upgrade over the Ryzen 7 …
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X was launched on April 19, 2018. Therefore, we are going to perform a 2020 CPU comparison between the Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 3700X.First let’s do a little history lesson and look at the differences between both CPUs. The frame rates however were much higher as the bot match didn’t see smoke grenades regularly going off.Using the pro match we see that the 3700X and 10600K are much more evenly matched. What is the best way to optimize my Ryzen 7 2700X?Very interesting. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. I don’t know that it would do so on an X570 board either. Big margins are still seen when using the RTX 2080 Ti and although the 2700X matched the average frame rate of the 10600K, the Intel processor was 13% faster when comparing 1% low performance.PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds results show a more mild 13% performance uplift for the 3700X over the 2700X, and while that’s still a nice generation-on-generation uplift, it’s one of the smaller gains we’ve seen so far.It’s worth noting that the Core i5-10600K was 17% faster than the 3700X, so Intel does enjoy a substantial performance advantage in this title. The 10600K was also up to 32% faster than the 2nd-gen Ryzen processor.Because the 3700X is able to bridge the gap between the 2700X and 10600K, we find when using a less powerful GPU like the RTX 2060 Super that the 3rd-gen Ryzen processor is able to push the mid-range GeForce GPU to its limits.