Secondary Source Characteristics Secondary sources are best identified by their use of primary articles as source material. Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books. … 1) Data reliability. It leads to better social mobility and encourages prosperity and growth in the present and future. You should use secondary sources during your literature review. Because it is a secondary source. This is not so! The article has been updated to reflect this :)If you do cite secondary sources that describe primary sources, what the reader will read is: "the author says that someone else said that another person said that...".Hi Raimo! In scholarship, a secondary source is a document or recording that relates or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Some think this is because the information is unreliable or not scientific, or simply not credible because anyone can edit it. Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but secondary sources show how your work relates to existing research.A primary source is anything that gives you direct evidence about the people, events, or phenomena that you are researching.
SECONDARY SOURCES Author's relationship to information: 'Secondhand' Author is a creator, participant or witness to the information presented. CHARACTERISTICS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES Primary Source Secondary Source First-hand evidence or eyewitness account of an event, circumstance or personality Second-hand account of an event, circumstance, or personality made after the time period being recorded Tells about the event without adding any interpretation or commentary that may Publication characteristics . But it's true that in scientific disciplines, you should cite primary sources (original empirical studies) in your literature review. Instead, you’ll probably test its arguments against new evidence or use its ideas to help formulate your own.The exception? I found this page very helpful and would like to reference you in my work. Secondary sources can include books, journal articles, speeches, reviews, research reports, and more. Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. This is very much not the case!Compare your paper with over 60 billion web pages and 30 million publications.Secondary sources are good for gaining a full overview of your topic and understanding how other researchers have approached it. The researcher should never take the secondary data and this it satisfies the following characteristics.
Secondary sources often offer a review or a critique. A secondary source describes, interprets, or synthesizes primary sources.